4.4 Article

Associations of visceral fat area and physical activity levels with the risk of metabolic syndrome in postmenopausal women

Journal

BIOGERONTOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages 357-366

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10522-017-9693-9

Keywords

Metabolic syndrome; Physical activity; Visceral fat; Women

Funding

  1. Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education
  2. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [MSM 6198959221]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study was aimed at the evaluation of relationship between visceral fat area (VFA) and physical activity (PA) with the metabolic syndrome (MetS) risk in the physically active postmenopausal women. A total of 85 attendants of the University of the Third Age (U3A) aged 62.8 +/- 5.9 years (median time since menopause 11.8 y), participated in this study. VFA was assessed by bioimpedance method using InBody 720 analyzer. PA was assessed using the ActiGraph GT1 M accelerometer. Fasting levels of serum lipids (TG, HDL), serum glucose, waist circumference (WC) and blood pressure were measured to diagnose MetS according to NCEP-ATP III criteria. In 73 out of 85 participants the VFA exceeded the upper normal level of 100 cm(2), however, in almost a half of this group (n = 36) with elevated VFA (139.5 +/- 26.1 cm(2) on average), only 2 out of 5 criteria for MetS diagnosis were met. Participants were physically active, making on average 10,919 +/- 3435 steps/day. The risk of MetS occurrence in women with VFA > 100 cm(2) was twelve times higher (OR 12.33; CI 95% [1.5; 99.8]) than in the group with VFA < 100 cm(2). The participants from the group with the highest PA level (>12,500 steps/day) were at almost 4 times lower risk for MetS, than their less active counterparts (OR 3.84; CI 95% [1.27;11.64]). Increased level of VFA is a strong risk factor for the MetS in postmenopausal women, however high level of regular PA above the threshold of 12,500 steps/day may substantially reduce it.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available