4.8 Article

Transition from Battery to Pseudocapacitor Behavior via Structural Water in Tungsten Oxide

Journal

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
Volume 29, Issue 9, Pages 3928-3937

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b05485

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. State of North Carolina
  2. National Science Foundation [ECCS-1542015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The kinetics of energy storage in transition metal oxides are usually limited by solid-state diffusion, and the strategy most often utilized to improve their rate capability is to reduce ion diffusion distances by utilizing nanostructured materials. Here, another strategy for improving the kinetics of layered transition metal oxides by the presence of structural water is proposed. To investigate this strategy, the electrochemical energy storage behavior of a model hydrated layered oxide, WO3. 2H(2)O, is compared with that of anhydrous WO3 in an acidic electrolyte. It is found that the presence of structural water leads to a transition from battery-like behavior in the anhydrous WO3 to ideally pseudocapacitive behavior in WO3 center dot 2H(2)O. As a result, WO3 center dot 2H(2)O exhibits significantly improved capacity retention and energy efficiency for proton storage over WO3 at sweep rates as fast as 200 mV s(-1), corresponding to charge/discharge times of just a few seconds. Importantly, the energy storage of WO3. 2H(2)O at such rates is nearly 100% efficient, unlike in the case of anhydrous WO3. Pseudocapacitance in WO3 center dot 2H(2)O allows for high-mass loading electrodes (>3 mg cm(-2)) and high areal capacitances (>0.25 F cm(-2) at 200 mV s(-1)) with simple slurry-cast electrodes. These results demonstrate a new approach for developing pseudocapacitance in layered transition metal oxides for high-power energy storage, as well as the importance of energy efficiency as a metric of performance of pseudocapacitive materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available