4.8 Article

Improved Tumor Uptake by Optimizing Liposome Based RES Blockade Strategy

Journal

THERANOSTICS
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 319-328

Publisher

IVYSPRING INT PUBL
DOI: 10.7150/thno.18078

Keywords

Reticuloendothelial system; Nanoparticle; Liposome blockade; Positron Emission Tomography; Enhanced tumor uptake

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0203600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51502251, 81571743]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for Xiamen University [20720160067]
  4. Science Foundation of Fujian Province [2014Y2004]
  5. Intramural Research Program (IRP), National Institute of Biomedical Imaging (NIBIB), National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Minimizing the sequestration of nanomaterials (NMs) by the reticuloendothelial system (RES) can enhance the circulation time of NMs, and thus increase their tumor-specific accumulation. Liposomes are generally regarded as safe (GRAS) agents that can block the RES reversibly and temporarily. With the help of positron emission tomography (PET), we monitored the in vivo tissue distribution of Cu-64-labeled 40 x 10 nm gold nanorods (Au NRs) after pretreatment with liposomes. We systematically studied the effectiveness of liposome administration by comparing (1) differently charged liposomes; (2) different liposome doses; and (3) varying time intervals between liposome dose and NR dose. By pre-injecting 400 mu mol/kg positively charged liposomes into mice 5 h before the Au NRs, the liver and spleen uptakes of Au NRs decreased by 30% and 53%, respectively. Significantly, U87MG tumor uptake of Au NRs increased from 11.5 +/- 1.1 % ID/g to 16.1 +/- 1.3 % ID/g at 27 h post-injection. Quantitative PET imaging is a valuable tool to understand the fate of NMs in vivo and cationic liposomal pretreatment is a viable approach to reduce RES clearance, prolong circulation, and improve tumor uptake.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available