4.2 Review

Parathyroid hormone stimulates adipose tissue browning: a pathway to muscle wasting

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000357

Keywords

cancer cachexia; insulin resistance in chronic kidney disease; parathyroid hormone

Funding

  1. VA Career Development Award [1IK2 BX002492]
  2. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development Program
  3. NIH [R37 DK37175]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Studying organ-to-organ communications (i.e. crosstalk) uncovers mechanisms regulating metabolism in several tissues. What is missing is identification of mediators of different catabolic conditions contributing to losses of adipose and muscle tissues. Identifying mediators involved in organ-to-organ crosstalk could lead to innovative therapeutic strategies because several disorders such as chronic kidney disease (CKD), cancer cachexia, and other catabolic conditions share signals of worsening metabolism and increased risk of mortality. Recent findings A recent breakthrough published in Cell Metabolism leads to the conclusion that parathyroid hormone (PTH) and parathyroid hormone-related peptide (PTHrP) cause `browning' of white adipose tissue plus energy production via activation of uncoupling protein-1. Browning was associated with muscle wasting in mouse models of cancer and CKD. The pathway to browning includes PTH/PTHrP activation of protein kinase A (PKA) and lost muscle mass via the ubiquitin proteasome proteolytic system (UPS). Summary The results suggest that crosstalk between muscle and fat contributes in a major way to tissue catabolism. The pathway initiated by PTH or PTHrP is novel and it suggests potential interrelationships that control metabolism in other catabolic conditions. Identifying how the parathyroid hormone-PKA-UPS axis relates to obesity, type 2 diabetes, and other insulin-resistant conditions remains unclear.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available