4.7 Review

Intralesional treatment of metastatic melanoma: a review of therapeutic options

Journal

CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY
Volume 66, Issue 5, Pages 647-656

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00262-016-1952-0

Keywords

Intralesional; Immunocytokine; Neoadjuvant; Stage III B/C melanoma; Phase 3; CIMT 2016

Funding

  1. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETHZ)
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
  3. European Research Council (ERC) Advanced Grant (ZAUBERKUGEL)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intralesional therapy of melanoma patients with locally advanced metastatic disease is attracting increasing interest, not least due to its ability to lead to both direct tumor cell killing and the stimulation of both a local and a systemic immune response. An obvious pre-requisite for this type of approach is the presence of accessible metastases that are amenable to direct injection with the therapeutic agent of interest. Patients who present with these characteristics belong to stages IIIB/C or IV of the disease. Surgical resection with intention to cure is the standard of care for patients with limited tumor burden and confined spread of disease (resectable patients). However, this category of patients is at a high risk of further recurrences until the disease becomes inoperable (unresectable) or progresses to a more advanced stage with visceral organ involvement, after which the prognosis is particularly grim. Most of the intralesional treatments tested so far, including the recently approved oncolytic virus talimogene laherparepvec, target the subpopulation of patients with unresectable disease, but the possibility to use the intralesional treatment in a neoadjuvant setting for fully resectable patients is attracting considerable interest. The present article reviews approved products and advanced stage pharmaceutical agents in development for the intralesional treatment of melanoma patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available