4.2 Article

Long-term effects of fertilisers and organic sources on soil organic carbon fractions under a rice-wheat system in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of north-west India

Journal

SOIL RESEARCH
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages 296-308

Publisher

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/SR16097

Keywords

cereal residue; FYM; green gram residue; Inceptisol; labile SOC; sulphitation pressmud

Categories

Funding

  1. Indian Council of Agricultural Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Decline in soil organic carbon (SOC) content is considered a key constraint for sustenance of rice-wheat system (RWS) productivity in the Indo-Gangetic Plain region. We, therefore, studied the effects of fertilisers and manures on SOC pools, and their relationships with crop yields after 18 years of continuous RWS. Total organic C increased significantly with the integrated use of fertilisers and organic sources (from 13 to 16.03gkg(-1)) compared with unfertilised control (11.5gkg(-1)) or sole fertiliser (NPKZn; 12.17gkg(-1)) treatment at 0-7.5cm soil depth. Averaged across soil depths, labile fractions like microbial biomass C (MBC) and permanganate-oxidisable C (PmOC) were generally higher in treatments that received farmyard manure (FYM), sulfitation pressmud (SPM) or green gram residue (GR) along with NPK fertiliser, ranging from 192 to 276mgkg(-1) and from 0.60 to 0.75gkg(-1) respectively compared with NPKZn and NPK+cereal residue (CR) treatments, in which MBC and PmOC ranged from 118 to 170mgkg(-1) and from 0.43 to 0.57gkg(-1) respectively. Oxidisable organic C fractions revealed that very labile C and labile C fractions were much larger in the NPK+FYM or NPK+GR+FYM treatments, whereas the less-labile C and non-labile C fractions were larger under control and NPK+CR treatments. On average, Walkley-Black C, PmOC and MBC contributed 29-46%, 4.7-6.6% and 1.16-2.40% towards TOC respectively. Integrated plant nutrient supply options, except NPK+CR, also produced sustainable high yields of RWS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available