4.7 Article

Environmental policy design, innovation and efficiency gains in electricity generation

Journal

ENERGY ECONOMICS
Volume 63, Issue -, Pages 106-115

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.01.014

Keywords

Technological innovation; Air pollution; Thermal power plant; Directional distance function model; Patent stock

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  2. Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan [S15]
  3. [26000001B]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K12858] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper explores the relationship between environmental regulation, innovation, and competitiveness using environmental patent data. The analysis is conducted in two stages. First, a non-parametric frontier analysis is implemented to estimate efficiency scores, including a measure of technological innovation based on patent stocks. Second, econometric methods are applied to analyse the role of policy stringency and policy design on efficiency. Our estimation sample covers thermal power plant sectors in 20 countries from 1990 to 2009. The results show that the stringency of environmental regulations is a significant determinant of productive efficiency with respect to pollutant emissions as well as fuel use. However, these effects turn negative once the level of stringency leaps over a certain threshold. In addition, the paper concludes that the positive effect of regulatory stringency can be diminished by a negative effect of regulatory differentiation with measures which vary in stringency across plant size and age having negative consequences, and these effects are increasing over time. Finally, it is found that integrated approaches to environmental innovation are more likely to bring about efficiency improvements than end-of-pipe technologies. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available