Journal
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages 1353-1374Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-017-1304-1
Keywords
Cluster analysis; Human-wildlife coexistence; Predator-friendly practices; Taxonomy of ranchers; Theory of planned behavior; Wildlife damage prevention
Funding
- Wildlife Without Borders Program at the US Fish and Wildlife Service
- Chester Zoo
- Cleveland Metroparks Zoo
- Panthera Foundation
- UF Tropical Conservation and Development
- Program for Studies in Tropical Conservation
- Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation at the University of Florida
- Fulbright Faculty Development Program
- School of Biology at the University of Costa Rica
- Costa Rican Ministry of Environment
- National System of Conservation Areas
- Wild Cat Conflict Response Unit (UACFel in Spanish)
- US Department of Interior
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Ranchers living near large carnivores can adopt diverse practices to prevent livestock damage. Effective management interventions to help reduce damage must address the varied needs of ranchers by segmenting audiences for more targeted programs. We developed a typology that conceptualized six types of ranchers based on the theory of planned behavior. We posited that rancher types were driven by: attitudes; social norms; perceived control; emotional disposition; risk perception; and contextual factors. To test the typology throughout Costa Rica, we conducted a structured survey of a random sample of 93 ranchers affected by jaguar and puma predation and paired them with a sample of 69 unaffected neighbors. Cluster analyses of survey results provided empirical support for a typology of four types of ranchers, two of which were predicted by the theory of planned behavior: preventive ranchers who take control to prevent felid damage; and helpless ranchers who lack control. We also identified a risk-neutral type who takes no action as they do not perceive the cats as a threat; and a cat-troubled type influenced mainly by negative emotions toward big cats. This last type supports the need to include emotional factors in theoretical frameworks when dealing with human-wildlife conflict. The typology is useful for designing improved policy and management interventions to reduce wildlife conflicts.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available