4.4 Review

The Role of EGFR-Met Interactions in the Pathogenesis of Glioblastoma and Resistance to Treatment

Journal

CURRENT CANCER DRUG TARGETS
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages 297-302

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1568009616666161215162515

Keywords

EGFR; Met; glioma; glioblastoma; GBM; targeted treatment; synergistic; antagonistic. EGFR wild type; EGFRvIII; EGFR mutants

Categories

Funding

  1. Merit Review Award from the Departments of Veterans Affairs [1I01BX002559-01]
  2. NIH grant [R01 NS062080]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults. It is a devastating and intractable disease with a poor outcome. Aberrant receptor tyrosine kinase signaling is a key driver in gliomagenesis and resistance to treatment. EGFR gene amplification and mutations are an important genetic alteration in GBM resulting in increased expression of EGFR wild type (EGFRwt) as well as mutant oncogenic forms of the EGFR. EGFRvIII is the most common oncogenic mutant in GBM and is usually co-expressed with EGFRwt. EGFRvIII does not bind ligand and is constitutively active. Recent studies have also highlighted a key role for Met in gliomagenesis and the EGFR and Met may act in concert to promote the malignant phenotype. Met is transactivated by EGFRvIII and plays a key role in EGFRvIII-mediated resistance to targeted treatment. HGF, a Met ligand, is highly expressed in GBM. HGF and Met create an important autocrine signaling loop that promotes GBM invasion. In addition, HGF/Met is able to induce EGFR activation, leading to enhanced activation of oncogenic signaling in GBM. In this review, we discuss the evidence for EGFR and Met interaction in GBM and discuss the mechanisms and biological consequences of transactivation between the two kinases. Additionally, we discuss the therapeutic potential of targeting both EGFR and Met signaling for the treatment of GBM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available