4.2 Article

Co-Activation of TGFP and Wnt Signalling Pathways Abrogates EMT in Ovarian Cancer Cells

Journal

CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages 1336-1345

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000464436

Keywords

EMT; TGFp; Wnt; beta-catenin

Funding

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) [0101, 0206]
  2. Govt.of India
  3. CSIR fellowship [31/039(0332)/2012-EMR-I]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: The aggressive property of ovarian cancer (OC) in terms of epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT), proliferation and metastasis are of major concern. Different growth factors including TGF beta are associated with regulating these molecular events but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. The aim of this report is to decipher the regulation of EMT by co-activation of TGF beta and Wnt signalling cascades in gaining malignancy. Methods: The expression of the different components of signalling events were analyzed by QPCR. Western blot, Immunofluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. beta-catenin promoter activity was checked by luciferase assay. Results: We observed reduced EMT in ovarian cancer cells upon co-activation with TGF beta 1 and LiCl as shown by the expressions of epithelial/mesenchymal markers and the EMT promoting factor, Snaill, accompanied by decrease in the invasion and migration of the cells compared to individual pathway activation. A detailed study of the mechanism suggested reduction in the beta-catenin and p-GSK3b (Ser 9) levels to be the driving cause of this phenomenon, which was reversed upon co-activation with higher concentrations of LiCl. Conclusions: Therefore, tumourigenesis might be affected by the concentration of ligand/growth factors for the respective signalling pathways activated in the tumour microenvironment and interaction between them might alter tumourigenesis. (C) 2017 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available