4.7 Article

Comparison of three cell-based drug screening platforms for HSV-1 infection

Journal

ANTIVIRAL RESEARCH
Volume 142, Issue -, Pages 136-140

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2017.03.016

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [5R01MH063480-12, 5R01MH045817]
  2. Scioto Foundation [07R-1712]
  3. Pittsburgh Center for Kidney Research Kidney Imaging Core [NIH P30 DK079307]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acyclovir (ACV) and its derivatives have been highly effective for treating recurrent, lytic infections with Herpes Simplex Virus, type 1 (HSV-1), but searches for additional antiviral drugs are motivated by recent reports of resistance to ACV, particularly among immunocompromised patients. In addition, the relative neurotoxicity of ACV and its inability to prevent neurological sequelae among HSV-1 encephalitis survivors compel searches for new drugs to treat HSV-1 infections of the central nervous system (CNS). Primary drug screens for neurotropic viruses like HSV-1 typically utilize non-neuronal cell lines, but they may miss drugs that have neuron specific antiviral effects. Therefore, we compared the effects of a panel of conventional and novel anti-herpetic compounds in monkey epithelial (Vero) cells, human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs)-derived neural progenitor cells (NPCs) and hiPSC-derived neurons (N = 73 drugs). While the profiles of activity for the majority of the drugs were similar in all three tissues, Vero cells were less likely than NPCs to identify drugs with substantial inhibitory activity in hiPSCderived neurons. We discuss the relative merits of each cell type for antiviral drug screens against neuronal infections with HSV-1. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available