4.7 Article

Elucidation of Dietary Polyphenolics as Potential Inhibitor of Microtubule Affinity Regulating Kinase 4: In silico and In vitro Studies

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-09941-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Science & Engineering Research Board, Department of Science and Technology, Government of India [EMR/2015/002372]
  2. Indian Council of Medical Research
  3. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India [SR/FST/LSI-541/2012]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [22A20130011024, 2016R1D1A1B03932659] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microtubule affinity regulating kinase 4 (MARK4) is a Ser/Thr kinase belonging to AMPK-like family, has recently become an important drug target against cancer and neurodegenerative disorders. In this study, we have evaluated different natural dietary polyphenolics including rutin, quercetin, ferulic acid, hesperidin, gallic acid and vanillin as MARK4 inhibitors. All compounds are primarily binds to the active site cavity of MARK4. In silico observations were further complemented by the fluorescence-binding studies and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) measurements. We found that rutin and vanillin bind to MARK4 with a reasonably high affinity. ATPase and tau-phosphorylation assay further suggesting that rutin and vanillin inhibit the enzyme activity of MARK4 to a great extent. Cell proliferation, ROS quantification and Annexin-V staining studies are clearly providing sufficient evidences for the apoptotic potential of rutin and vanillin. In conclusion, rutin and vanillin may be considered as potential inhibitors for MARK4 and further exploited to design novel therapeutic molecules against MARK4 associated diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available