4.7 Article

Reversal of hepatorenal syndrome type 1 with terlipressin plus albumin vs. placebo plus albumin in a pooled analysis of the OT-0401 and REVERSE randomised clinical studies

Journal

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 45, Issue 11, Pages 1390-1402

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apt.14052

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ikaria Therapeutics LLC/a Mallinckrodt Company

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundThe goal of hepatorenal syndrome type 1 (HRS-1) treatment is to improve renal function. Terlipressin, a synthetic vasopressin analogue, is a systemic vasoconstrictor used for the treatment of HRS-1, where it is available. AimTo compare the efficacy of terlipressin plus albumin vs. placebo plus albumin in patients with HRS-1. MethodsPooled patient-level data from two large phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled studies were analysed for HRS reversal [serum creatinine (SCr) value 133mol/L], 90-day survival, need for renal replacement therapy and predictors of HRS reversal. Patients received intravenous terlipressin 1-2mg every 6hours plus albumin or placebo plus albumin up to 14days. ResultsThe pooled analysis comprised 308 patients (terlipressin: n=153; placebo: n=155). HRS reversal was significantly more frequent with terlipressin vs. placebo (27% vs. 14%; P=0.004). Terlipressin was associated with a more significant improvement in renal function from baseline until end of treatment, with a mean between-group difference in SCr concentration of -53.0mol/L (P<0.0001). Lower SCr, lower mean arterial pressure and lower total bilirubin and absence of known precipitating factors for HRS were independent predictors of HRS reversal and longer survival in terlipressin-treated patients. ConclusionsTerlipressin plus albumin resulted in a significantly higher rate of HRS reversal vs. albumin alone in patients with HRS-1. Terlipressin treatment is associated with improved renal function. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: OT-0401, NCT00089570; REVERSE, NCT01143246).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available