4.1 Article

Machine learning applied to the prediction of citrus production

Journal

SPANISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

INST NACIONAL INVESTIGACION & TECNOLOGIA AGRARIA & ALIMENTARIA-INIA-CSIC
DOI: 10.5424/sjar/2017152-9090

Keywords

lemon; mandarin; orange; M5-Prime; age; framework; irrigation

Funding

  1. Northeastern University [SGCYT PI 1713CA03]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness/FEDER [TEC2015-67387-C4-3-R]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An in-depth knowledge about variables affecting production is required in order to predict global production and take decisions in agriculture. Machine learning is a technique used in agricultural planning and precision agriculture. This work (i) studies the effectiveness of machine learning techniques for predicting orchards production; and (ii) variables affecting this production were also identified. Data from 964 orchards of lemon, mandarin, and orange in Corrientes, Argentina are analysed. Graphic and analytical descriptive statistics, correlation coefficients, principal component analysis and Biplot were performed. Production was predicted via M5-Prime, a model regression tree constructor which produces a classification based on piecewise linear functions. For all the species studied, the most informative variable was the trees' age; in mandarin and orange orchards, age was followed by between and within row distances; irrigation also affected mandarin production. Also, the performance of M5-Prime in the prediction of production is adequate, as shown when measured with correlation coefficients (similar to 0.8) and relative mean absolute error (similar to 0.1). These results show that M5-Prime is an appropriate method to classify citrus orchards according to production and, in addition, it allows for identifying the most informative variables affecting production by tree.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available