4.8 Article

Graphene oxide nanosheets at trace concentrations elicit neurotoxicity in the offspring of zebrafish

Journal

CARBON
Volume 117, Issue -, Pages 182-191

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.02.092

Keywords

Nanotechnology; Carbon-based nanomaterial; Environmental implication; Oxidative stress; Graphene oxide

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21577070, 21407085]
  2. Tianjin Natural Science Foundation [16JCQNJC08400]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse Foundation [PCRRF16023]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies of the environmental and health risks of graphene oxide (GO, a carbon nanosheet of broad concern) have focused on direct exposure. In contrast, the effects of GO on offspring through parental exposure at trace concentrations remain largely unknown, particularly in sensitive neurological systems. Thus, parental zebrafish were exposed to GO nanosheets at concentrations of 0.01-1 mu g/L. GO trans located from the water to the brains of parental and offspring fish with a significant loss of claudin5a (a core component of the neuroepithelial barrier system). GO did not trigger obvious neurotoxicity in parental zebrafish, whereas remarkable neurotoxicity occurred in the offspring, which exhibited a loss of dopaminergic neurons and reductions in acetylcholinesterase activity. In the offspring, ER damage, autophagy promotion, ubiquitin downregulation and increased beta-galactosidase activity were observed. Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis revealed that the failures of carbohydrate and fatty acid metabolisms positively contributed to the loss of offspring dopaminergic neurons. The above results support the need for offspring to be examined in nanotoxicology, even for environmentally relevant concentrations. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available