4.7 Article

Phase-microstructure-property relationship in high quality factor MgO-Al2O3-SiO2-TiO2-La2O3 glass-ceramics

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 43, Issue 9, Pages 7073-7079

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.02.137

Keywords

electric properties; Glass -ceramics; Magnesium aluminum titanate; Rutile

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MgO-Al2O3-SiO2-TiO2-La2O3 glass-ceramics were investigated with respect to the phase compositions and the microstructure as well as the microwave dielectric properties. Indialite, magnesium aluminum titanate (MAT, Mg4Al2Ti9O25), perrierite, and spinel were the main crystal phases in the studied 1.8MgO-1.2Al(2)O(3)-2.8SiO(2)-1.4TiO(2)-xLa(2)O(3) (x=0.4, 0.3, 0.2) glass -ceramics. Mg4Al2Ti9O25 was detected inside the indialite domain as well as at the boundary while no decomposition product (rutile) is found, proving that Mg4Al2Ti9O25 is fully stabilized. After heat-treatment at 1200 degrees C, the quality factor (Qxf) of the glass -ceramics increases from 27,500 to 40,000 GHz with decreasing La2O3 concentrations. This is caused by the formation of more indialite and MAT. Meanwhile, the temperature coefficient (T-f) shifts positively from 95 to 65 ppm/degrees C because of the smaller perrierite concentration. However, Tf is still too negative due to the absence of ruffle that possesses a high positive Tf. For the 1.3MgO-1.2Al(2)O(3)-2.8SiO(2)-1.4TiO(2)-0.2La(2)O(3) glass-ceramic with lower MgO molar composition, the peaks assigned to rutile is found and the chemical formula of MAT changes to MgAl2Ti3O10 while spinel disappears. MgAl2Ti3O10, which distributes mainly at the boundary, decomposes partially, leading to the precipitation of rutile inside the indialite domain. Thus, the Tf of the glass-ceramic could be adjusted to near 0 ppm/degrees C with epsilon r=9.9 and Qxf=28,600 GHz, which are favorable properties for microwave dielectric applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available