4.7 Article

The investigations of hematite-CuO oxygen carrier in chemical looping combustion

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 317, Issue -, Pages 132-142

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.01.091

Keywords

Chemical looping combustion; Bimetallic oxygen carrier; Hematite; Copper

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51476029, 51276037, 51561125001, 51406035]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cu-Fe bimetallic oxygen carrier is a promising candidate for chemical looping combustion, but the cost of manufacture is a significant limit for its application. In this study, the bimetallic oxygen carrier was prepared using hematite and CuO simply through direct mixing method with low cost. The cyclic combustion performance and effects of temperature were investigated in a batch fluidized bed. Cycle experiments with gas fuel indicated that the bimetallic oxygen carrier possessed increasing reactivity with cycle, which could be ascribed to improved porous structure. However, some agglomeration occurred when the content of Cu reached 20% in weight. Besides, the cyclic operation with coal showed that the bimetallic oxygen carriers with Cu ratios of 5% and 10% possessed good long term operation characteristics and the oxygen carrier with 10% Cu performed better. The conversion of coal increased with the reaction temperature and higher temperature, above 900 degrees C, was needed for fast conversion of coal. Additionally, the manufactured oxygen carriers were characterized. In the bimetallic oxygen carriers, Cu distributed uniformly on the surface of particle but the content of Cu decreased with cycles caused by attrition. Besides, the bimetallic oxygen carrier possessed a stable chemical composition. Overall, the Cu-Fe bimetallic oxygen carrier prepared by direct mixing method is a competitive oxygen carrier, which deserves more attention. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available