4.8 Article

Dual Targeting Nanoparticle Stimulates the Immune System To Inhibit Tumor Growth

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages 5417-5429

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.6b08152

Keywords

cancer immunotherapy; nanoparticle; combination therapy; CD8+T cell; T cell receptor repertoire; melanoma; colon cancer

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DGE-1232825]
  2. NIH Cancer Nanotechnology Training Center at the JHU Institute for Nanobiotechnology [2T32CA153952-06]
  3. National Cancer Institute of the NIH [F31CA206344]
  4. National Institutes of Health [P01-AI072677, R01-CA108835, R21-CA185819]
  5. TEDCO/Maryland Innovation Initiative
  6. Coulter Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We describe the development of a nano particle platform that overcomes the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. These nanoparticles are coated with two different antibodies that simultaneously block the inhibitory checkpoint PD-L1 signal and stimulate T cells via the 4-IBB co-stimulatory pathway. These immunoswitch particles significantly delay tumor growth and extend survival in multiple in vivo models of murine melanoma and colon cancer in comparison to the use of soluble antibodies or nanoparticles separately conjugated with the inhibitory and stimulating antibodies. Immunoswitch particles enhance effector-target cell conjugation and bypass the requirement for a priori knowledge of tumor antigens. The use of the immunoswitch nanoparticles resulted in an increased density, specificity, and in vivo functionality of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells. Changes in the T cell receptor repertoire against a single tumor antigen indicate immunoswitch particles expand an effective set of T cell clones. Our data show the potential of a signal-switching approach to cancer immunotherapy that simultaneously targets two stages of the cancer immunity cycle resulting in robust antitumor activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available