4.4 Article

On Secure Underlay MIMO Cognitive Radio Networks With Energy Harvesting and Transmit Antenna Selection

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGCN.2017.2684827

Keywords

Multiple-input-multiple-output; cognitive radio networks; energy harvesting; secrecy outage performance; transmit antenna selection

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61471076, 61401372]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT_16R72]
  3. Special Fund for the Key Laboratory of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission
  4. Project of Fundamental and Frontier Research Plan of Chongqing [cstc2015jcyjBX0085]
  5. Scientific and Technological Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission [KJ1600413]
  6. Post-Doctoral Research Award through the Qatar National Research Fund (Qatar Foundation) [PDRA1-1227-13029]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we consider an underlay multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) cognitive radio network (CRN) including a pair of primary nodes, a couple of secondary nodes, and an eavesdropper, where the secondary transmitter is powered by the renewable energy harvested from the primary transmitter in order to improve both energy efficiency and spectral efficiency. Based on whether the channel state information of wiretap links are available or not, the secrecy outage performance of the optimal antenna selection (OAS) scheme and suboptimal antenna selection (SAS) scheme for underlay MIMO CRN with energy harvesting are investigated and compared with traditional space-time transmission scheme. The closed-form expressions for exact and asymptotic secrecy outage probability are derived. Monte-Carlo simulations are conducted to testify the accuracy of the analytical results. The analysis illustrates that the OAS scheme outperforms SAS scheme. Furthermore, the asymptotic result shows that no matter which scheme is considered, the OAS and SAS schemes can achieve the same secrecy diversity order.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available