4.5 Article

IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040

Journal

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 128, Issue -, Pages 40-50

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.03.024

Keywords

Diabetes mellitus; Health economics; Mortality; Epidemiology; Impaired glucose tolerance; Gestational diabetes

Funding

  1. AstraZeneca
  2. Lilly Diabetes
  3. Merck Sharp and Dohme
  4. Novo Nordisk

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: To produce current estimates of the national, regional and global impact of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify data sources on the prevalence of diabetes from studies conducted in the period from 1990 to 2015. An analytic hierarchy process was used to select the most appropriate studies for each country, and estimates for countries without data were modelled using extrapolation from similar countries that had available data. A logistic regression model was used to generate smoothed age-specific estimates, which were applied to UN population estimates. Results: 540 data sources were reviewed, of which 196 sources from 111 countries were selected. In 2015 it was estimated that there were 415 million (uncertainty interval: 340536 million) people with diabetes aged 20-79 years, 5.0 million deaths attributable to diabetes, and the total global health expenditure due to diabetes was estimated at 673 billion US dollars. Three quarters (75%) of those with diabetes were living in low-and middle-income countries. The number of people with diabetes aged 20-79 years was predicted to rise to 642 million (uncertainty interval: 521-829 million) by 2040. Conclusion: Diabetes prevalence, deaths attributable to diabetes, and health expenditure due to diabetes continue to rise across the globe with important social, financial and health system implications. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available