4.7 Article

Human thymoproteasome variations influence CD8 T cell selection

Journal

SCIENCE IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 2, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aan5165

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Japan Society for Promotion of Science (JSPS) [KAKENHI 15H05703, 16H05202, 16K14648, 17H05788]
  2. Japan Foundation for Applied Enzymology
  3. Takeda Science Foundation
  4. Naito Foundation
  5. National Center for Global Health and Medicine [24A-112, 26A-105]
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17H05788, 15H05703, 16K14648, 16H05202, 26000014] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The proteasome is a multi-subunit protease complex essential for housekeeping protein degradation and the production of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I-bound antigen peptides that are essential for recognition by CD8 T cells. MHC variations dramatically contribute to T cell selection and autoimmunity, but genetic variations of peptide processing machinery including proteasome genes have been poorly explored in this context. In the computational analysis of human proteasome gene variation, we documented that PSMB11 was highly enriched for nucleotide changes that interfere with protein function. This gene encodes beta 5t, a thymusspecific catalytic subunit that regulates positive selection of CD8 T cells by producing a distinct set of MHC class I-bound peptides. The introduction of PSMB11 variations into the mouse genome by genome-editing revealed that these variations impaired the development of CD8 T cells in vivo. One of the PSMB11 polymorphisms altered the CD8 T cell repertoire in mice and was associated with a higher risk of an autoimmune disease in humans. Our findings suggest that, in addition to the MHC haplotype, proteasome variations influence T cell repertoire selection and may contribute to the difference in individual susceptibility to autoimmunity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available