4.5 Article

Using stable isotopes to explore root-microbe-mineral interactions in soil

Journal

RHIZOSPHERE
Volume 3, Issue -, Pages 244-253

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.rhisph.2017.04.016

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research Genomic Science program [DE-SC0010570, DE-SC0014079, DE-SC0016247, SCW1039, SCW1421, SCW1424, SCW1555]
  2. LDRD at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) [07-ERD-053, 10-ERD-021]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC52-07NA27344]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The few millimeters of soil surrounding a plant's roots, the 'rhizosphere', are a nexus of biological activity, and inhabited by microorganisms that are critically important to both plant health and soil carbon (C) transformation and stabilization. Advancing our understanding of plant-microbe interactions and the soil carbon cycle requires disentangling the complex relationships among roots, soil microbes, mycorrhizae, and soil mineral surfaces. Yet in wildland systems, many important mechanistic rhizosphere questions remain unanswered. For example, most root C is decomposed to CO2, but of the remainder, what microbial transformations lead to the opportunity to become stabilized? How do plant species and microbial functionality regulate flows of C and nutrients, and how much do these vary over space and time? Transfer of root carbon to bacterial and fungal cell biomass may be a particularly important activity that precedes C stabilization on mineral surfaces, but the steps involved in this process remain ambiguous. In the past decade, multiple 'isotope-enabled' approaches have been developed that allow us to see and measure these complex rhizosphere interactions with high spatial, chemical, and molecular resolution. Here we present illustrative examples of these approaches as applied in non-cultivated soil systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available