4.8 Article

Investigation on the contact between graphdiyne and Cu (111) surface

Journal

CARBON
Volume 117, Issue -, Pages 246-251

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.02.097

Keywords

Graphdiyne; Copper surface; Interface; Bonding strength; Charge transfer; Density of state

Funding

  1. National Natural Science of Foundation of China [51575246, 61076098]
  2. Six talent peaks project in Jiangsu Province [JXQC-006]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Special Foundation [2014T70476]
  5. Innovative Science Foundation for Graduate Students of Jiangsu Province [KYLX15_1054, CXZZ13_0655, CXLX12_0622]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since graphdiyne has been proved with excellent physical properties and successfully synthesized on copper foil, understanding its contact with copper surface is of great significance for its applications. Here, we investigate the interfacial structural, mechanical and electronic properties of the contact between graphdiyne and Cu (111) surface through first principles calculations. The most stable interface structure is confirmed according to interfacial binding energies. The interface rigid peeling process is simulated to obtain the interfacial bonding strength. Different kinds of interfacial interactions are found by the results of charge density and density of state. With interface distance decreasing, charges are transferred from the copper surface to the upper layer graphdiyne, and different bond interactions occur between surface Cu atoms and graphdiyne, which make the contact between graphdiyne and copper surface more tightly and provide a bridge for charge transfer at the interface. The results are hoped to be helpful to understand the contact between graphdiyne and copper surface and predict the performance of related nanoelectronics. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available