4.7 Review

Reassessing Escherichia coli as a cell factory for biofuel production

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue -, Pages 92-103

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2017.02.010

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. C1 Gas Refinery Program through the NRF funded by the MSIP [NRF-2016M3D3A1A01913246/ NRF 2015M3D3A1A01064882]
  2. National Research Foundation, MSIP, Korea [NRF-2016M1A2A2924237]
  3. Gyeongsang National University Fund for Professors on Sabbatical Leave
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  5. US Department of Energy [DE-SC0010329]
  6. National Science Foundation [CBET 1149678, EFRI-1240268]
  7. William F. Vilas Trust
  8. Directorate For Engineering
  9. Emerging Frontiers & Multidisciplinary Activities [1240268] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  11. Directorate For Engineering [1149678] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  12. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0010329] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Via metabolic engineering, industrial microorganisms have the potential to convert renewable substrates into a wide range of biofuels that can address energy security and environmental challenges associated with current fossil fuels. The userfriendly bacterium, Escherichia coli, remains one of the most frequently used hosts for demonstrating production of biofuel candidates including alcohol-, fatty acid- and terpenoid-based biofuels. In this review, we summarize the metabolic pathways for synthesis of these biofuels and assess enabling technologies that assist in regulating biofuel synthesis pathways and rapidly assembling novel E. coli strains. These advances maintain E. coli's position as a prominent host for developing cell factories for biofuel production.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available