4.7 Article

A cell-printing approach for obtaining hASC-laden scaffolds by using a collagen/polyphenol bioink

Journal

BIOFABRICATION
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/aa6997

Keywords

bioink; cell-printing; hASCs; tissue engineering

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (MEST) [NRF-2015R1A2A1A15055305]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2015R1A2A1A15055305, 2013H1A2A1034262] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the cell-printing process, bioink has been considered as an extremely important component for successful fabrication of macroscale cell-laden structures. Bioink should be non-toxic, biocompatible, and printable. To date, alginate has been widely used as a whole or partial component of bioink because it is non-toxic to embedded cells and even it can provide good printability with rapid gelation under calcium ions. However, alginate bioinks do not possess cell-activating ability. To overcome the shortcomings of alginate-based bioinks, a new collagen bioink, which was mixed with human adipose stem cells (hASCs) and crosslinked with a polyphenol (tannic acid), was proposed. The feasibility of the bioink was demonstrated using several in vitro assessments for comparison of the macroscale porous cell-laden collagen/polyphenol structure containing the hASCs with the conventional alginate-based cell-laden structure. The levels of the metabolic activity, including the cell viability and cell proliferation, of the cell-laden collagen structure were significantly higher than those of the control (alginate-based cell-laden structure). The results show that the newly designed bioink and cell-laden structure are potentially new outstanding components for regeneration of various tissues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available