Journal
POLITICAL QUARTERLY
Volume 88, Issue 2, Pages 182-188Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1467-923X.12371
Keywords
Brexit; constitution; referendum; Supreme Court; democracy; legitimacy
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Members and supporters of the British government say that the only constitutionally legitimate course of action over Brexit after the referendum is to press ahead with withdrawal from the European Union, even if that would entail the complete severance of all ties (which we normally call hard Brexit'). A more sophisticated view of the constitution, however, shows that these more or less populist arguments are false. As the Supreme Court confirmed in the recent Gina Miller judgment, the constitution did not change with the June referendum. Parliament is still supreme and determines both ordinary legislation and constitutional change. In fact, if one examines closely the claim that the referendum entails hard Brexit, it becomes obvious that this claim is false as well. The referendum opened the door for one among four different possibilities. Which Brexit optionif anythe United Kingdom should take is a matter for Parliament now to decide, following the normal processes of democratic deliberation and representation.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available