4.7 Article

Water policy debate in Australia: Understanding the tenets of stakeholders' social trust

Journal

LAND USE POLICY
Volume 63, Issue -, Pages 246-254

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.01.035

Keywords

Best-worst scaling; Applied economics; Social trust; Murray-Darling basin; Water policy reform

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [LP0990429, DP140103946, FT140100773]
  2. CSIRO Land and Water
  3. Australian Research Council [LP0990429] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The increasing physical and economic scarcity of water due to increasing societal demands and climate change will require worldwide water policy reform. Water reform is an area of public policy fraught with polarised positions regarding community and environmental welfare. As opposition to water policy reform becomes entrenched, transaction costs increase. Nowhere is this more evident than the controversy surrounding, and irrigators' opposition to, the Murray-Darling Basin Plan in Australia. This study sought to understand irrigators' trust issues and why they feel the way they do towards water reform, though a best-worst survey methodology and regression analysis. The results suggest that irrigators believe they are shouldering a fair share of the water reform burden. Lack of trust in the national water agency and the federal government is associated with irrigator location, age and climate change disbelief. Findings support the recent push for more localised water decision-making to promote social trust. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available