4.7 Article

Gestational age-specific sex difference in mortality and morbidities of preterm infants: A nationwide study

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-06490-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Research of Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [2016-ER6307-00]
  2. Korea Health Promotion Institute [2016-ER6307-00] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to determine whether male sex has adverse effect on mortality and morbidities in very low birth weight infants (VLBWI) < 30 weeks of gestation and to ascertain this sex effect, stratified by gestational age, adjusting for perinatal risk factors. This is a population-based study from Korean Neonatal Network for VLBWI born at 23(+0) and 29(+6) weeks of gestation between January 2013 and December 2014. The primary outcome was gestation-specific sex difference in the occurrence of mortality, combined morbidities, and individual morbidity. A total of 2228 VLBWI were enrolled (males, 51.7%). Mortality was not different between sexes. The risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia and combined morbidities was significantly higher in males <= 25 weeks of gestation (odds ratio [ OR] 2.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-3.20 and OR 2.00, CI 1.19-3.39, respectively). Males had a significantly higher incidence of periventricular leukomalacia at 23 and 29 weeks of gestation. The risk of severe retinopathy of prematurity was higher in females >25 weeks of gestation. Although both sexes have similar risk for mortality, male sex remains an independent risk for major morbidities, especially at <= 25 weeks of gestation. The risk of each outcome for males has a specific pattern with increasing gestational age.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available