4.8 Article

Molecular Sieving Across Centimeter-Scale Single-Layer Nanoporous Graphene Membranes

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages 5726-5736

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b01231

Keywords

gas separation; graphene; membranes; two-dimensional materials; nanofluidics; atomically thin; leakage

Funding

  1. MIT Energy Initiative seed grant
  2. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0008059]
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) postgraduate scholarships program
  4. National Science Foundation under NSF [ECS-0335765]
  5. MRSEC Shared Experimental Facilities at MIT
  6. National Science Foundation [DMR-1419807]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Molecular sieving across atomically thin nanoporous graphene is predicted to enable superior gas separation performance compared to conventional membranes. Although molecular sieving has been demonstrated across a few pores in microscale graphene membranes, leakage through nonselective defects presents a major challenge toward realizing selective membranes with high densities of pores over macroscopic areas. Guided by multiscale gas transport modeling of nanoporous graphene membranes, we designed the porous support beneath the graphene to isolate small defects and minimize leakage through larger defects. Ion bombardment followed by oxygen plasma etching was used to produce subnanometer pores in graphene at a density of similar to 10(11) cm(-2). Gas permeance measurements demonstrate selectivity that exceeds the Knudsen effusion ratio and scales with the kinetic diameter of the gas molecules, providing evidence of molecular sieving across centimeter-scale nanoporous graphene. The extracted nanoporous graphene performance is comparable to or exceeds the Robeson limit for polymeric gas separation membranes, confirming the potential of nanoporous graphene membranes for gas separations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available