4.0 Article

Exploring the design space of immersive urban analytics

Journal

VISUAL INFORMATICS
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages 132-142

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.visinf.2017.11.002

Keywords

Immersive urban analytics; Virtual/Augmented/Mixed reality; Urban visualizations; Information visualizations; Visualization theory

Funding

  1. National 973 Program of China [2015CB352503]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61772456, U1609217]
  3. NSFC-Zhejiang Joint Fund for the Integration of Industrialization and Informatization [U1609217]
  4. NSFC [61502416]
  5. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation [LR18F020001]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities [2016QNA5014]
  7. Ministry of Education of China [188170-170160502]
  8. 100 Talents Program of Zhejiang University
  9. Microsoft Research Asia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent years have witnessed the rapid development and wide adoption of immersive head-mounted devices, such as HTC VIVE, Oculus Rift, and Microsoft HoloLens. These immersive devices have the potential to significantly extend the methodology of urban visual analytics by providing critical 3D context information and creating a sense of presence. In this paper, we propose a theoretical model to characterize the visualizations in immersive urban analytics. Furthermore, based on our comprehensive and concise model, we contribute a typology of combination methods of 2D and 3D visualizations that distinguishes between linked views, embedded views, and mixed views. We also propose a supporting guideline to assist users in selecting a proper view under certain circumstances by considering visual geometry and spatial distribution of the 2D and 3D visualizations. Finally, based on existing work, possible future research opportunities are explored and discussed. (C) 2017 Zhejiang University and Zhejiang University Press. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available