4.7 Article

Adaptive evolution of proteins in hepatitis B virus during divergence of genotypes

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-02012-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Grand Program on Key Infectious Diseases [2015ZX10004801]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program on Precision Medicine [2016YFC0901700, 2016YFC0901900, 2016YFC0901600]
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2015AA020104, 2015AA020108]
  4. National Key Scientific Instrument and Equipment Development Project [2012YQ03026108]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is classified into several genotypes, correlated with different geographic distributions, clinical outcomes and susceptible human populations. It is crucial to investigate the evolutionary significance behind the diversification of HBV genotypes, because it improves our understanding of their pathological differences and pathogen-host interactions. Here, we performed comprehensive analysis of HBV genome sequences collected from public database. With a stringent criteria, we generated a dataset of 2992 HBV genomes from eight major genotypes. In particular, we applied a specified classification of non-synonymous and synonymous variants in overlapping regions, to distinguish joint and independent gene evolutions. We confirmed the presence of selective constraints over non-synonymous variants in consideration of overlapping regions. We then performed the McDonald-Kreitman test and revealed adaptive evolutions of non-synonymous variants during genotypic differentiation. Remarkably, we identified strong positive selection that drove the differentiation of PreS1 domain, which is an essential regulator involved in viral transmission. Our study presents novel evidences for the adaptive evolution of HBV genotypes, which suggests that these viruses evolve directionally for maintenance or improvement of successful infections.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available