4.8 Article

Composite Salt in Porous Metal-Organic Frameworks for Adsorption Heat Transformation

Journal

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
Volume 27, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201606424

Keywords

batteries; composite materials; hybrid materials; metal-organic frameworks; porous materials

Funding

  1. Spanish MINECO [PN MAT2015-65354-C2-1-R]
  2. Catalan AGAUR [2014 SGR 80]
  3. ERC under the EU FP7 [ERC-Co 615954]
  4. European Union's Horizon research and innovation programme [685727]
  5. Spanish MINECO through the Severo Ochoa Centers of Excellence Programme [SEV-2013-0295]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adsorptive heat transformation systems such as adsorption thermal batteries and chillers can provide space heating and cooling in a more environmental friendly way. However, their use is still hindered by their relatively poor performances and large sizes due to the limited properties of solid adsorbents. Here, the spray-drying continuous-flow synthesis of a new type of solid adsorbents that results from combining metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), such as UiO-66, and hygroscopic salts, such as CaCl2 has been reported. These adsorbents, commonly named as composite salt in porous matrix (CSPM) materials, allow improving the water uptake capabilities of MOFs while preventing their dissolution in the water adsorbed; a common characteristic of these salts due to the deliquescence effect. It is anticipated that MOF-based CSPMs, in which the percentage of salt can be tuned, are promising candidates for thermal batteries and chillers. In these applications, it is showed that a CSPM made of UiO-66 and CaCl2 (38% w/w) exhibits a heat storage capacity of 367 kJ kg(-1), whereas a second CSPM made of UiO-66 and CaCl2 (53% w/w) shows a specific cooling power of 631 W kg(-1) and a coefficient of performance of 0.83, comparable to the best solid adsorbents reported so far.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available