4.7 Article

A series of generalized correlations for predicting the thermal conductivity of composite materials packing with artificially designed filler shapes

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 120, Issue -, Pages 444-452

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.04.002

Keywords

Effective thermal conductivity; Composite materials; Artificial designed fillers

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51406223]
  2. Qing Lan Project of Jiangsu Province
  3. 333 high level talents training project of Jiangsu province
  4. Six Talent Peak high-level talents of Jiangsu Province

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Enhancement of the thermal conductivity of composite materials has become more and more common in heat exchangers by applying artificially designed fillers. In this paper, the effective thermal conductivity of composite materials is investigated based on an extensive numerical study. The effective thermal conductivity of composite materials packing with different shapes of fillers are compared under the same volume fraction, thermal conductivity ratio and the thermal conduct resistance. The results indicate that the effective thermal conductivity of composite materials decreases as the thermal conduct resistance increases and the decline ratio will gradually slow down. Different shapes of fillers have different sensitivity degree on the thermal conduct resistance. Composite materials packing with the fillers which provide a longer path for the heat flow have a higher effective thermal conductivity than other types of fillers. A series of new generalized correlations is proposed by using the method of nonlinear regression. These new generalized correlations can be used at a wide range of thermal conductivity ratio (1 <= kappa <= 1000), thermal conductivity resistance (0 < R-c* <= 1) and volume fraction (0 < phi <= 0.2). (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available