4.7 Article

A rapid and low-cost estimation of bacteria counts in solution using fluorescence spectroscopy

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 409, Issue 16, Pages 3959-3967

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-017-0347-1

Keywords

Bacteria; Fluorescence spectroscopy; Acridine orange; Enumeration; Microbial contamination

Funding

  1. Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [UOAX1411]
  2. University of Auckland
  3. New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE) [UOAX1411] Funding Source: New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The fluorescence spectrum of bacterially bound acridine orange (AO) was investigated to evaluate its use for the rapid enumeration of bacteria. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 samples were stained with 2 x 10(-2), 2 x 10(-3) or 2 x 10(-4)% w/v AO, followed by 3, 2 or 0 washing cycles, respectively, and fluorescence spectra were recorded using a fibre-based spectroscopic system. Independent component analysis was used to analyse the spectral datasets for each staining method. Bacterial concentration order of magnitude classification models were calculated using independent component weights. The relationship between fluorescence intensity of bound AO and bacterial concentration was not linear. However, the spectral signals collected for AO stain concentration-bacterial concentration pairs were reproducible and unique enough to enable classification of samples. When above 10(5) CFU ml(-1), it was possible to rapidly determine what the order of magnitude of bacterial concentration of a sample was using a combination of two of the sample preparation methods. A relatively inexpensive (around US$10 per test) rapid method (within 25 min of sampling) for enumeration of bacteria by order of magnitude will reduce the time and cost of microbiological tests requiring gross concentration information.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available