4.1 Article

Molecular characterization of a cohort of 73 patients with infantile spasms syndrome

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS
Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages 51-58

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2014.11.007

Keywords

West syndrome; Infantile spasms syndrome; CDKL5; STXBP1; MEF2C; SCN2A

Funding

  1. Hospices Civils de Lyon

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Infantile Spasms syndrome (ISs) is a characterized by epileptic spasms occurring in clusters with an onset in the first year of life. West syndrome represents a subset of ISs that associates spasms in clusters, a hypsarrhythmia EEG pattern and a developmental arrest or regression. Aetiology of ISs is widely heterogeneous including many genetic causes. Many patients, however, remain without etiological diagnosis, which is critical for prognostic purpose and genetic counselling. In the present study, we performed genetic screening of 73 patients with different types of ISs by array-CGH and molecular analysis of 5 genes: CDKL5, STXBP1, KCNQ2, and GRIN2A, whose mutations cause different types of epileptic encephalopathies, including ISs, as well as MAGI2, which was suggested to be related to a subset of ISs. In total, we found a disease-causing mutation or CNV (Copy Number Variation) in 15% of the patients. These included 6 point mutations found in CDKL5 (n = 3) and STXBP1 (n = 3), 3 microdeletions (10 Mb in 2q24.3, 3.2 Mb in 5q14.3 including the region upstream to MEF2C, and 256 kb in 9q34 disrupting EHMT1), and 2 microduplications (671 kb in 2q24.3 encompassing SCN2A, and 11.93 Mb in Xq28). In addition, we discuss 3 CNVs as potential risk factors, including one 16p12.1 deletion, one intronic deletion of the NEDD4 gene, and one intronic deletion of CALN1 gene. The present findings highlight the efficacy of combined cytogenetic and targeted mutation screening to improve the diagnostic yield in patient with ISs. (C) 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available