4.6 Article

Enhanced photoelectric performance of (2Al, S) co-doped rutile SnO2

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 7, Issue 68, Pages 42940-42945

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ra07891a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1261103]
  2. Shenhua Group Corp. [U1261103]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province of China [201601D011023]
  4. Graduate Science and Technology Innovation Fund Project of Shanxi [2017BY053]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, theoretical calculations and experiments have been carried out to investigate the photoelectric performance of (2Al, S) co-doped rutile SnO2. The electronic structures are studied by density functional theory (DFT). It is found that the metal Al can assist the bonding of the incorporated S with the neighboring O in SnO2, introducing new energy levels in the forbidden band of SnO2, which enhance the photoelectric performance. Meanwhile, the experiments are conducted to verify this. The (2Al, S) co-doped SnO2 with different doping ratios are prepared by a hydrothermal method. The samples are characterized by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Results show that all the samples have rutile structure without any extra phase, and the dopant S2- ion was implanted into the crystalline lattice of (2Al, S) co-doped SnO2 and Al dopants replaced Sn atoms. The photoelectric performance tests show Al and S co-doping can improve the photoelectric performance, especially with a doping ratio of 5%, when the photocurrent reaches maximum of 3.0 mu A cm(-2) which is almost twice as much as pure SnO2, and the impedance is the smallest. The experiments results are consistent with our theoretical calculations. These findings are expected to be helpful for the design of highly active tin oxide-based photoelectric materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available