4.7 Article

The Three-dimensional Expansion of the Ejecta from Tycho's Supernova Remnant

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 842, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7384

Keywords

ISM: individual objects (Tycho's SNR); ISM: supernova remnants; supernovae: general

Funding

  1. Chandra X- ray Center [GO4-15074Z]
  2. Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory for and on behalf of NASA [NAS8-03060]
  3. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1616570] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the first 3D measurements of the velocity of various ejecta knots in Tycho's supernova remnant, known to result from a Type Ia explosion. Chandra X-ray observations over a 12 yr baseline from 2003 to 2015 allow us to measure the proper motion of nearly 60 tufts of Si-rich ejecta, giving us the velocity in the plane of the sky. For the line-of-sight velocity, we use two different methods: a nonequilibrium ionization model fit to the strong Si and S lines in the 1.2-2.8 keV regime, and a fit consisting of a series of Gaussian lines. These methods give consistent results, allowing us to determine the redshift or blueshift of each of the knots. Assuming a distance of 3.5 kpc, we find total velocities that range from 2400 to 6600 km s(-1), with a mean of 4430 km s(-1). We find several regions where the ejecta knots have overtaken the forward shock. These regions have proper motions in excess of 6000 km s(-1). Some SN Ia explosion models predict a velocity asymmetry in the ejecta. We find no such velocity asymmetries in Tycho, and we discuss our findings in light of various explosion models, favoring those delayed-detonation models with relatively vigorous and symmetrical deflagrations. Finally, we compare measurements with models of the remnant's evolution that include both smooth and clumpy ejecta profiles, finding that both ejecta profiles can be accommodated by the observations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available