4.7 Article

Nanofibrillation of deep eutectic solvent-treated paper and board cellulose pulps

Journal

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
Volume 169, Issue -, Pages 167-175

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.04.009

Keywords

Choline chloride; DES; Fibrillation; Nanocellulose; Refining; Waste board

Funding

  1. Council of Oulu Region - European Regional Development Fund of the European Union for the High Performance Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomasses for the Sustainable Biorefinery Value Chains Project (PREBIO)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, several cellulose board grades, including waste board, fluting, and waste milk container board, were pretreated with green choline chloride-urea deep eutectic solvent (DES) and nanofibrillated using a Masuko grinder. DES-treated bleached chemical birch pulp, NaOH-swollen waste board, and bleached chemical birch pulp were used as reference materials. The properties of the nanofibrils after disc grinding were compared with those obtained through microfluidization. Overall, the choline chloride-urea DES pretreatment significantly enhanced the nanofibrillation of the board pulps in both nanofibrillation methods as compared with NaOH-treated pulps and resulted in fine and long individual nanofibrils and some larger nanofibril bunches, as determined by field emission scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. The nanofibril suspensions obtained from the DES pretreatment had a viscous, gel-like appearance with shear thinning behavior. The nanofibrils maintained their initial crystalline structure with a crystallinity index of 61%-47%. Improved board handsheet properties also showed that DES-treated and Masuko-ground waste board and paper nanocellulose can potentially enhance the strength of the board. Consequently, the DES chemical pretreatment appears to be a promising route to obtain cellulose nanofibrils from waste board and paper. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available