4.6 Article

Facile green synthesis of nanomagnets for modulating magnetohyperthermia: tailoring size, shape and phase

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 7, Issue 75, Pages 47669-47680

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ra09446a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  3. Fundacao de Apoio a Pesquisa do Distrito Federal (FAPDF)
  4. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Goias (FAPEG)
  5. Decanato de Pesquisa e Inovacao (DPI-UnB)
  6. Fundacao de Empreendimentos Cientificos e Tecnologicos (FINATEC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports the successful production of both isometric and anisometric iron oxide-based nanoparticles using, respectively, ammonia and urea for co-precipitating Fe2+/Fe3+ from aqueous solution. Spherical nanoparticles (SNPs) with 10-20 nm in diameter are obtained using ammonia under reflux from 1 h to 9 h, with their relative magnetite/maghemite content decreasing from 10 to 0.05. However, using a lower and higher concentration of urea under reflux from 1 h to 12 h results in rod-like nanoparticles (RNPs) with length/width varying from 40/16 to 80/20 nm and hexagonal nanoparticles (HNPs) with diagonal varying from 150 to 100 nm, respectively. For RNPs (HNPs) the relative magnetite/goethite content increases with refluxing time from 0.25 to 2 (1.25 to 3.75). Hysteresis cycles (300 K) show unblocked SNPs and blocked RNPs and HNPs with coercivity (remanence) increasing with refluxing time from 55 to 80 Oe (1 to 5 emu g(-1)) and 70 to 130 Oe (5 to 13 emu g(-1)), respectively. Saturation magnetization of SNPs, RNPs and HNPs spans from 50 to 65 emu g(-1), 12 to 60 emu g(-1) and 57 to 80 emu g(-1), respectively. Under AC magnetic field (522 kHz), with amplitude ranging from 70 to 310 Oe, SNPs show a strong hyperthermia effect, following HNPs with mild and RNPs with weak effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available