4.5 Article

Comparisons of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) XCO2 measurements with TCCON

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages 2209-2238

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/amt-10-2209-2017

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NASA
  2. EU project InGOS
  3. EU project ICOS-INWIRE
  4. Senate of Bremen
  5. NASA [NAG512247, NNG05GD07G, NNX14AI60G, NNX11AG01G, NAG5-12247, NNG05-GD07G]
  6. Australian Research Council [DP140101552, DP110103118, DP0879468, LE0668470, LP0562346, DE140100178]
  7. Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy under EU project ICOS-Inwire and ministerial decree for ICOS [FR/35/IC2]
  8. Universite de La Reunion [LACy/UMR8105]
  9. NASA's Orbiting Carbon Observatory Program
  10. New Zealand Foundation of Research Science and Technology [CO1X0204, CO1X0703, CO1X0406]
  11. NIWA's Atmosphere Research Programme [3 (2011/13)]
  12. Atlantic Innovation Fund/Nova Scotia Research Innovation Trust
  13. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  14. Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences
  15. Canadian Space Agency
  16. Environment Canada
  17. Government of Canada
  18. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
  19. Northern Scientific Training Program
  20. Ontario Innovation Trust
  21. Ontario Research Fund
  22. Polar Continental Shelf Program
  23. DOE OBER's TES
  24. NGEE-Tropics program
  25. Australian Research Council [DE140100178] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

NASA's Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) has been measuring carbon dioxide column-averaged dryair mole fraction, X-CO2, in the Earth's atmosphere for over 2 years. In this paper, we describe the comparisons between the first major release of the OCO-2 retrieval algorithm (B7r) and X-CO2 from OCO-2's primary ground-based validation network: the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON). The OCO-2 X-CO2 retrievals, after filtering and bias correction, agree well when aggregated around and coincident with TCCON data in nadir, glint, and target observation modes, with absolute median differences less than 0.4 ppm and RMS differences less than 1.5 ppm. After bias correction, residual biases remain. These biases appear to depend on latitude, surface properties, and scattering by aerosols. It is thus crucial to continue measurement comparisons with TCCON to monitor and evaluate the OCO-2 X-CO2 data quality throughout its mission.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available