4.6 Article

Purification of antibiotics from the millet extract using hybrid molecularly imprinted polymers based on deep eutectic solvents

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 7, Issue 28, Pages 16997-17004

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ra01059a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [NRF-2015R1A4A1042434]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2015R1A4A1042434] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Deep eutectic solvents (DESs) are potential ecofriendly surfactants for the preparation of various materials. In this study, molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) were modified by betaine-based DESs. These materials were characterized by field emission scanning electron microscope and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The molecular recognition capability for antibiotics of materials was evaluated by static absorption and dynamic adsorption curves. Five materials were used as solid phase extraction (SPE) adsorbents for the rapid purification of levofloxacin and tetracycline from the millet extract. The DES-based materials showed more selective adsorption than the conventional MIPs. The adsorption curves of DES-MIP showed superior molecular recognition ability and binding capability for antibiotics than the other materials. The limit of detection and the limit of quantitation of the method for levofloxacin were 0.01 mg mL(-1) and 0.03 mg mL(-1), respectively. The method recoveries ranged from 97.2-100.2% for levofloxacin with DES-LMIP and 95.7-99.2% for tetracycline with DES-TMIP. DES-LMIP and DES-TMIP showed the highest selectivity recovery for levofloxacin (94.5%) and tetracycline (93.3%) from millet extract with mixture antibiotics, and could remove the interferent effectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available