4.1 Article

A model of cognitive and operational memory of organizations in changing worlds

Journal

CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages 775-806

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/cje/bew067

Keywords

Organizational memory; Routines; Cognitive categories; Conditionaction rules

Categories

Funding

  1. Institute for New Economic Thinking (INET) [IN 01100022]
  2. European Union [603416]
  3. Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation grant [649186]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Economics and Competitiveness [ECO2013-45864-P]
  5. Community of Madrid [S2015/HUM-3417]
  6. European Social Fund
  7. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [649186] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work analyzes and models the nature and dynamics of organizational memory, as such an essential ingredient of organizational capabilities that determine strategic choices in different competitive environments. There are two sides to it, namely a cognitive side, involving the beliefs and interpretative frameworks by which the organization categorizes the states of the world and its own internal states, and an operational one, including routines and procedures that store the knowledge of how to do things. We formalize both types of memory by means of evolving systems of condition-action rules and investigate their performance in different environments characterized by varying degrees of complexity and non-stationarity. Broadly speaking, in simple and stable environments memory does not matter, provided it satisfies some minimal requirements. In more complex and gradually changing ones, having more memory provides an advantage. However, there is some critical level of environmental instability above which forgetfulness is evolutionary superior from the point of view of long-term performance. Moreover, above some (modest) complexity threshold, stable and robust cognitive categorizations and routinized behaviour emerge.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available