4.7 Article

Effects of fiber shape, aspect ratio, and volume fraction on flexural behavior of ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced cement composites

Journal

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
Volume 174, Issue -, Pages 375-388

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.04.069

Keywords

Ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced cement composites; Fiber type; Aspect ratio; Fiber volume fraction; Flexural performance; Cost analysis

Funding

  1. Construction Technology Research (Development of impact/blast resistant HPFRCC and evaluation technique thereof) - Ministry on Land, Infrastructure, and Transport [13SCIPS02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the feasibility of reducing fiber content in ultra-high-performance fiberreinforced cement composites (UHP-FRCC). For this, three different types of steel fibers were considered, and three different aspect ratios were applied for the case of straight fibers. To quantitatively evaluate the cost effectiveness of reducing the fiber content of UHP-FRCC, cost analysis was also performed. Test results indicated that at low fiber volume fractions (Vf <= 1.0%), the twisted fibers provided the highest flexural strength, but they exhibited similar strength and poorer toughness than the straight fibers at a Vf equal to or higher than 1.5%. Smaller flexural strength and toughness were observed in the specimens with hooked fibers than those with straight ones at a Vf equal to or higher than 1.0%. In the case of straight fibers, the one with the highest aspect ratio was more effective in improving the flexural performance than those with lower aspect ratios. The medium-length straight fibers were most efficient at improving the flexural performance of UHP-FRCC at a Vf equal to or higher than 1.5%. The total production costs of commercially available UHP-FRCC could be reduced by as much as 32-35% by replacing short straight fibers with medium-length or long straight fibers. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available