4.7 Article

Antigen Availability Shapes T Cell Differentiation and Function during Tuberculosis

Journal

CELL HOST & MICROBE
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages 695-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.05.012

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [U19 AI106761, R01 AI076327, T21-CA009537]
  2. Paul G. Allen Family Foundation
  3. NIH Tetramer Core Facility [HHSN272201300006C]
  4. European Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDC TP) [IP.2007.32080.001]
  5. Statens Serum Institut
  6. European Commission [H2020-PHC-643381]
  7. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) Global Health grant [OPP1066265]
  8. Bank of America Dissertation Fellowship
  9. Carnegie Corporation of New York
  10. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1066265] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CD4 T cells are critical for protective immunity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), the cause of tuberculosis (TB). Yet to date, TB vaccine candidates that boost antigen-specific CD4 T cells have conferred little or no protection. Here we examined CD4 T cell responses to two leading TB vaccine antigens, ESAT-6 and Ag85B, in Mtb-infected mice and in vaccinated humans with and without underlying Mtb infection. In both species, Mtb infection drove ESAT-6-specific T cells to be more differentiated than Ag85B-specific T cells. The ability of each T cell population to control Mtb in the lungs of mice was restricted for opposite reasons: Ag85B-specific T cells were limited by reduced antigen expression during persistent infection, whereas ESAT-6-specific T cells became functionally exhausted due to chronic antigenic stimulation. Our findings suggest that different vaccination strategies will be required to optimize protection mediated by T cells recognizing antigens expressed at distinct stages of Mtb infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available