4.6 Article

Biological fate of food nanoemulsions and the nutrients they carry - internalisation, transport and cytotoxicity of edible nanoemulsions in Caco-2 intestinal cells

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 7, Issue 64, Pages 40053-40066

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ra07804h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DPIV Our Rural Landscape
  2. CSIRO Food Futures Flagship initiatives

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Edible nanoemulsions are promising delivery systems with the potential to enhance nutrient/drug solubilisation, digestibility, bioavailability and potentially facilitate direct cellular uptake. However, the high potential of edible nanoparticles has also led to concerns about their biological fate and whether these nanoparticles or the active ingredients they carry pose (new) toxicological risks. Here we outline the development of new sub 50 nm edible nanoemulsions that allow us to probe the duality of enhanced nutrient solubilisation and bioavailability with potential toxicological side effects. The toxicity and biological fate of the edible nanoemulsions was investigated using Caco-2 cells to facilitate cell viability assays, transport of nanoemulsions across an in vitro intestinal model and internalisation visualised by confocal microscopy. These experiments demonstrate that edible nanoemulsion toxicity is not just a function of surfactant composition, but more critically a synergistic effect between surfactants and their physical location. Critically the presence of reactive ingredients (beta-carotene) leads to a dramatic increase in nanoemulsion toxicity that may counteract the benefits associated with enhanced solubilisation/cellular uptake. Such research into the biological fate of edible food nanoemulsions and the nutrients they carry is important not only because nanotechnology in food is an emotive topic, but also because these insights may inform public policy decisions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available