4.5 Article

Synthesis and preliminary biological evaluation of [11C]methyl (2-amino-5-(benzylthio)thiazolo[4,5-d]pyrimidin-7-yl)-D-leucinate for the fractalkine receptor (CX3CR1)

Journal

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 27, Issue 12, Pages 2727-2730

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2017.04.052

Keywords

[C-11]Methyl (2-amino-5-(benzylthio)thiazolo[4,5-d]pyrimidin-7-yl)-D-leucinate; Fractalkine receptor (CX(3)CR1); Radiosynthesis; Radioligand depletion experiment; Competitive binding assay; Positron emission tomography (PET)

Funding

  1. Advanced Imaging Research and Technology Development (AIRTD) grants from the Indiana University Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences in the United States
  2. United States National Science Foundation (NSF) Major Research Instrumentation Program (MRI) [CHE-0619254]
  3. Unmet Need Competition

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The reference standard methyl (2-amino-5-(benzylthio) thiazolo[4,5-d] pyrimidin-7-yl)-D-leucinate (5) and its precursor 2-amino-5-(benzylthio) thiazolo[4,5-d] pyrimidin-7-yl)-D-leucine (6) were synthesized from 6-amino-2-mercaptopyrimidin-4-ol and BnBr with overall chemical yield 7% in five steps and 4% in six steps, respectively. The target tracer [C-11] methyl (2-amino-5-(benzylthio) thiazolo[4,5-d] pyrimidin- 7-yl)-D-leucinate ([C-11] 5) was prepared from the acid precursor with [C-11] CH3OTf through O-[C-11] methylation and isolated by HPLC combined with SPE in 40-50% radiochemical yield, based on [C-11] CO2 and decay corrected to end of bombardment (EOB). The radiochemical purity was >99%, and the specific activity (SA) at EOB was 370-1110 GBq/mu mol with a total synthesis time of similar to 40-min from EOB. The radioligand depletion experiment of [C-11] 5 did not display specific binding to CX(3)CR1, and the competitive binding assay of ligand 5 found much lower CX(3)CR1 binding affinity. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available