4.7 Article

Electroreduction of CO2 on polycrystalline copper: Effect of temperature on product selectivity

Journal

CATALYSIS TODAY
Volume 288, Issue -, Pages 24-29

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2016.09.028

Keywords

Carbon dioxide; Electrocatalysis; Copper; Temperature

Funding

  1. Center for the Capture and Conversion of CO2 (C4), a Center for Chemical Innovation - National Science Foundation [CHE-1240020]
  2. U.S. Department of Education [P200A120064]
  3. Brown University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we investigate the effect of temperature on product selectivity for the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide (CO2) on polycrystalline copper (Cu). We show that the temperature of an electrolyte solution can influence several reaction parameters in the CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR), including pH (both local and bulk), concentration of dissolved CO2 ([CO2]), solution resistance, the rate of diffusion of reactants to the electrode surface, and adsorbed intermediates. The working potential was -1.60V vs. Ag/AgCI to allow direct comparison with literature values. Under optimal reaction conditions at 2 degrees C, the faradaic efficiency (FE) for converting CO2 to methane (CH4) on a Cu electrocatalyst increases to ca. 50% while ethylene (C2H4) decreases to ca. 10%. Above room temperature, the production of hydrogen gas (H-2) dominates the electrochemical reaction, reaching >50% FE. The major products (i.e., >5% FE) observed at all temperatures studied were H-2, CH4, C2H4, carbon monoxide, and formate, with product selectivity driven by changes in [CO2] rather than changes in pH. Our initial goal was to confirm pH dependence of CO2RR on Cu at different temperatures. Importantly, we discovered that pH varies minimally over the temperature range studied (2 degrees C to 42 degrees C), in contrast to changes in [CO2] and corresponding changes in product selectivity. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available