4.5 Article

Assessment of subgrid-scale modeling for large-eddy simulation of a spatially-evolving compressible turbulent boundary layer

Journal

COMPUTERS & FLUIDS
Volume 151, Issue -, Pages 144-158

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.07.004

Keywords

Subgrid-scale (SGS) modeling; supersonic turbulent boundary layer (STBL); Large-Eddy simulation (LES); Wall-adapting local eddy-viscosity (WALE); Dynamic smagorinsky model (DSM); Coherent structures model (CSM)

Funding

  1. Regional Council of Upper Normandy (Region Haute Normandie)
  2. GENCI [t20162a7544]
  3. CRIANN (Centre Regional Informatique et d'Applications Numeriques de Normandie, Rouen)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The performance of three standard subgrid-scale (SGS) models, namely the wall-adapting local eddy viscosity (WALE) model, the Dynamic Smagorinsky model (DSM) and the Coherent Structures model (CSM), are investigated in the case of a spatially-evolving supersonic turbulent boundary layer (STBL) over a flat plate at M infinity=2 and Re-theta approximate to 2600. A high-order split-centered scheme is used to discretize the convective fluxes of the Navier-Stokes equations, and is found to be highly effective to overcome the dissipative character of the standard shock-capturing WENO scheme. The consistency and the accuracy of the simulations are evaluated using direct numerical simulations taken from the literature. It is demonstrated that all SGS models require a comparable minimum grid refinement in order to capture accurately the near-wall turbulence. Overall, the models exhibit correct behavior when predicting the dynamic properties, but show different performances for the temperature distribution in the near-wall region even for cases with satisfactory energy resolution of more than 80%. For a well-resolved LES, the SGS dissipation due to the fluctuating velocity gradients is found to dominate the total SGS dissipation. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available