4.7 Article

Effects of phosphorus slag powder and polyester fiber on performance characteristics of asphalt binders and resultant mixtures

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 141, Issue -, Pages 289-295

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.141

Keywords

Phosphorus slag powder; Polyester fiber; Rutting; Low temperature cracking; Moisture susceptibility

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51608046]
  2. Special Fund for Basic Scientific Research of Central Colleges, Chang'an University [310831171009, 310831171001]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015T81000, 2015M582590]
  4. Chinese Scholarship Council (CSC) of the Ministry of Education, China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of phosphorus slag powder (PSP) and polyester fiber (PF) on the rheological properties of asphalt binder and performance characteristics of resultant mixtures. It is also of great interest to determine whether the PSP can be used to replace conventional filler (i.e., limestone powder) without negatively affecting the mixture performance. A laboratory experiment was developed which included characterization of PSP and PF, determinations of the optimum content of PF and optimum PSP-binder ratio, and performance evaluation of asphalt mixtures with various combinations of PF, PSP and limestone powder. The PSP behaved effectively as a mineral filler such that it increased the binder viscosity resulting in enhanced mixture rutting resistance. The use of PF significantly improved the mixture resistance to low-temperature cracking and moisture damage as indicated by the flexural strain and tensile strength ratio results. Overall, mixture with 3% PF at the PSP-binder ratio of 1.0 outperformed the others with limestone powder and/or PF, indicating the feasibility of recycling PSP and PF into asphalt mixtures for satisfactory mixture performance. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available