4.5 Article

Design, synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular docking studies of novel 3-aryl-4-anilino-2H-chromen-2-one derivatives targeting ERα as anti-breast cancer agents

Journal

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 27, Issue 12, Pages 2668-2673

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2017.04.029

Keywords

3-Aryl-4-anilino-2H-chromen-2-one derivatives; Synthesis; Anti-breast cancer; ER alpha; Docking studies

Funding

  1. NSFC [81373279]
  2. Ministry of National Science and Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The estrogen receptor (ER) has played an important role in breast cancer development and progression and is a central target for anticancer drug discovery. In order to develop novel selective ER alpha modulators (SERMs), we designed and synthesized 18 novel 3-aryl-4-anilino-2H-chromen-2-one derivatives based on previously reported lead compounds. The biological results indicated that most of the compounds presented potent ER alpha binding affinity and possessed better anti-proliferative activities against MCF-7 and Ishikawa cell lines than the positive control tamoxifen. The piperidyl substituted compounds such as 16d and 18d demonstrated strong ER alpha binding affinities and excellent anti-proliferative activities respectively. Compound 18d displayed the most potent ER alpha binding affinity with RBA value of 2.83%, while 16d exhibited the best anti-proliferative activity against MCF-7 cells with IC50 value of 4.52 +/- 2.47 mu M. Further molecular docking studies were also carried out to investigate binding pattern of the newly synthesized compounds with ER alpha. All these results together with the structure-activity relationships (SARs) indicated that these 3-aryl-4-anilino-2H-chromen-2-one derivatives with basic side chain could serve as promising leads for further optimization as novel SERMs. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available